Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, L.
(American Journal of Botany. 2000;87:980-985.)
© 2000 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): nectar robbers as pollinators1

Luis Navarro2,0

0 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 23360, 00931-3360, San Juan, Puerto Rico

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the hypothesis that nectar robbing can affect plant reproductive success either positively or negatively. To this end, I investigated various aspects of the pollination ecology of a population of the herb Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris in northwest Spain over 5 yr. By observing floral visitors, I found that the most important pollinator species was the long-tongued bee Anthophora acervorum, which accounted for ~45% of recorded insect visits. However, just over 45% of visits were by the nectar-robbing bumble bees Bombus terrestris and B. jonellus. Although the incidence of robbing differed considerably over 5 yr of study, the frequency in every season was very high (66.4–76.5% of robbing) except for 1997 (0% robbing). Despite this high frequency of robbing, robbed flowers had a higher probability of setting fruit than nonrobbed flowers in all years of the study (mean: 82.0 vs. 51.0%; excluding 1997). This increased fruit set in robbed flowers is directly related to bumble bee behavior because the robbers' bodies came into contact with both the anthers and stigmas while robbing. Thus, the robbers effect pollination. These results suggest that the effect of nectar robbers on plant reproductive success is dependent both on the robbers' behavior and on flower/inflorescence structure. The importance of nectar-robbing bumble bees on the reproductive success of A. vulneraria and its yearly high frequency suggest that the relationship between robbers and this plant is part of a successful long-term mutualism.

Key Words: AnthyllisBombus • bumble bees • Fabaceae • nectar robbing • pollinator behavior




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. A. Burkle, R. E. Irwin, and D. A. Newman
Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2007; 94(12): 1935 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. J. Fumero-Caban and E. J. Melendez-Ackerman
Relative pollination effectiveness of floral visitors of Pitcairnia angustifolia (Bromeliaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. L. BUIDE
Pollination Ecology of Silene acutifolia (Caryophyllaceae): Floral Traits Variation and Pollinator Attraction
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2006; 97(2): 289 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. E. Maloof
The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2001; 88(11): 1960 - 1965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.