Am. J. Bot. Botany 2008 Ad
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. F.
(American Journal of Botany. 2000;87:883-897.)
© 2000 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Phylogenetic resolution within the tribe Episcieae (Gesneriaceae): congruence of ITS and NDHF sequences from parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses1

James F. Smith2,0

0 Department of Biology, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho 83725 USA

ABSTRACT

Generic relationships within Episcieae were assessed using ITS and ndhF sequences. Previous analyses of this tribe have focussed only on ndhF data and have excluded two genera, Rhoogeton and Oerstedina, which are included in this analysis. Data were analyzed using both parsimony and maximum-likelihood methods. Results from partition homogeneity tests imply that the two data sets are significantly incongruent, but when Rhoogeton is removed from the analysis, the data sets are not significantly different. The combined data sets reveal greater strength of relationships within the tribe with the exception of the position of Rhoogeton. Poorly or unresolved relationships based exclusively on ndhF data are more fully resolved with ITS data. These resolved clades include the monophyly of the genera Columnea and Paradrymonia and the sister-group relationship of Nematanthus and Codonanthe. A closer affinity between Neomortonia nummularia and N. rosea than has previously been seen is apparent from these data, although these two species are not monophyletic in any tree. Lastly, Capanea appears to be a member of Gloxinieae, although C. grandiflora remains within Episcieae. Evolution of fruit type, epiphytic habit, and presence of tubers is re-examined with the new data presented here.

Key Words: cladistics • DNA sequencing • Episcieae • Gesneriaceae • ITS • maximum-likelihood • ndhF.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
Q. C. B. Cronk, M. Kiehn, W. L. Wagner, and J. F. Smith
Evolution of Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) in the Pacific Ocean: the origin of a supertramp clade
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2005; 92(6): 1017 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K.-O. Yoo, P. P. Lowry II, and J. Wen
Discordance of chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data in Osmorhiza (Apiaceae)
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2002; 89(6): 966 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. A. Zimmer, E. H. Roalson, L. E. Skog, J. K. Boggan, and A. Idnurm
Phylogenetic relationships in the Gesnerioideae (Gesneriaceae) based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA trnL-F and trnE-T spacer region sequences
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 296 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
R. S. Millen, R. G. Olmstead, K. L. Adams, J. D. Palmer, N. T. Lao, L. Heggie, T. A. Kavanagh, J. M. Hibberd, J. C. Gray, C. W. Morden, et al.
Many Parallel Losses of infA from Chloroplast DNA during Angiosperm Evolution with Multiple Independent Transfers to the Nucleus
PLANT CELL, March 1, 2001; 13(3): 645 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.