|
|
||||||||
2 Laboratoire de Paléobotanique, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (Unité Mixte de Recherche 5554), Université Montpellier II, Place Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; and 3 Department of Biology0406, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0406 USA
ABSTRACT
A 5 m long trunk of a young Archaeopteris/Callixylon erianum tree from the Late Devonian of Morocco shows new branching patterns for early lignophytes. This progymnosperm tree produces a helical pattern of traces that we infer belonged to reduced, short-lived, primary (apical) branches (type A) as well as two types of adventitious traces (types B and H). We infer that type-B traces supplied branches that initiate close to the site of attachment on the trunk of some, but not all type-A branches in an irregular but nonrandom pattern. Unlike ephemeral type-A branches, those of type B persist and become long-lived, potentially permanent units of the architecture of Archaeopteris trees. Type-H adventitious traces are also short-lived and occur singly or in serial groups, but differ from traces of either type A or B branches by lacking differentiation into a readily identifiable organ category. We interpret type-H traces as supplying latent primordia that could develop into either adventitious roots or shoots depending on extrinsic factors. Our new data suggest that Archaeopteris had a wide range of branch primordium amplitude. Type-B branches compare with axillary lateral branch buds of some Early Carboniferous spermatophytes (Calamopitys) and are a major developmental departure from the strictly apical, pseudomonopodial shoot branching of older aneurophyte progymnosperms. Type-H traces suggest that Archaeopteris trees had some potential for formation of adventitious roots or shoots in response to environmental factors, such as partial burial by overbank sedimentation. Collectively, these novel methods of tree branching may partly explain the extraordinary success and worldwide dominance of Archaeopteris forests on fluvially dominated, Late Devonian floodplains.
Key Words: Archaeopteris Callixylon development Devonian evolution lignophytes progymnosperms trees
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. E. Stein and J. S. Boyer Evolution of land plant architecture: beyond the telome theory Paleobiology, September 1, 2006; 32(3): 450 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wang, B.-Y. Geng, and D. L. Dilcher New perspective on the architecture of the Late Devonian arborescent lycopsid Leptophloeum rhombicum (Leptophloeaceae) Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 83 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Niklas and T. Speck Evolutionary trends in safety factors against wind-induced stem failure Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2001; 88(7): 1266 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fairon-Demaret and I. Leponce Leaf dimorphism in Archaeopteris roemeriana (Progymnosperm): further early fossil evidence of shoot dorsiventrality Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2001; 88(4): 729 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |