Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryser, P.
Right arrow Articles by Eek, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryser, P.
Right arrow Articles by Eek, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ryser, P.
Right arrow Articles by Eek, L.
(American Journal of Botany. 2000;87:402-411.)
© 2000 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Consequences of phenotypic plasticity vs. interspecific differences in leaf and root traits for acquisition of aboveground and belowground resources1

Peter Ryser4,1 and Liina Eek2

1 Geobotanisches Institut ETH Zürich, Gladbachstr. 114, CH-8044 Zürich, Switzerland; and 2 Department of Botany and Ecology, Tartu University, Lai 40, EE-2400 Tartu, Estonia

ABSTRACT

Trade-offs between acquisition capacities for aboveground and belowground resources were investigated by studying the phenotypic plasticity of leaf and root traits in response to different irradiance levels at low nutrient supply. Two congeneric grasses with contrasting light requirements, Dactylis glomerata and D. polygama, were used. The aim was to analyze phenotypic covariation in components of leaf area and root length in response to above- and belowground resource limitation and the consequences of this variation for resource acquisition and plant growth. At intermediate shading (30 and 20% of full sunlight) the plants were able to maintain their total root length, despite a strongly increased total leaf area and a reduced biomass allocation to roots. This was associated with an unaltered or slightly increased nutrient uptake and growth. At 5.5% relative irradiance, growth was severely reduced, especially in the shade-tolerant D. polygama. The results show that constraints on acquisition capacities for aboveground and belowground resources, caused by biomass allocation, may be alleviated by plasticity in other traits such as tissue-mass density and thickness of roots and leaves. The results also suggest different adaptive constraints for phenotypic plasticity and for genetically determined interspecific variation. Phenotypic plasticity tends to maximize resource acquisition and growth rate in the short term, whereas the higher tissue-mass density and the longer leaf life-span of shade-tolerant species indicate reduced loss rates as a more advantageous species-specific adaptation to shade in the long term.

Key Words: adaptation • biomass allocation • Dactylis • leaf area • nutrient acquisition • Poaceae • root length • shade tolerance • tissue-mass density




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
O. K. Atkin, B. R. Loveys, L. J. Atkinson, and T. L. Pons
Phenotypic plasticity and growth temperature: understanding interspecific variability
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 267 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.