|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA; and 2 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK
ABSTRACT
The higher level relationships within Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) subfamily Apioideae are controversial, with no widely acceptable modern classification available. Comparative sequencing of the intron in chloroplast ribosomal protein gene rpl16 was carried out in order to examine evolutionary relationships among 119 species (99 genera) of subfamily Apioideae and 28 species from Apiaceae subfamilies Saniculoideae and Hydrocotyloideae, and putatively allied families Araliaceae and Pittosporaceae. Phylogenetic analyses of these intron sequences alone, or in conjunction with plastid rpoC1 intron sequences for a subset of the taxa, using maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining methods, reveal a pattern of relationships within Apioideae consistent with previously published chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS based phylogenies. Based on consensus of relationship, seven major lineages within the subfamily are recognized at the tribal level. These are referred to as tribes Heteromorpheae M. F. Watson & S. R. Downie Trib. Nov., Bupleureae Spreng. (1820), Oenantheae Dumort. (1827), Pleurospermeae M. F. Watson & S. R. Downie Trib. Nov., Smyrnieae Spreng. (1820), Aciphylleae M. F. Watson & S. R. Downie Trib. Nov., and Scandiceae Spreng. (1820). Scandiceae comprises subtribes Daucinae Dumort. (1827), Scandicinae Tausch (1834), and Torilidinae Dumort. (1827). Rpl16 intron sequences provide valuable characters for inferring high-level relationships within Apiaceae but, like the rpoC1 intron, are insufficient to resolve relationships among closely related taxa.
Key Words: Apiaceae Apioideae Hydrocotyloideae molecular phylogeny rpl16 intron rpoC1 intron Saniculoideae Umbelliferae
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. I. Calvino, S. G. Martinez, and S. R. Downie Morphology and biogeography of Apiaceae subfamily Saniculoideae as inferred by phylogenetic analysis of molecular data Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2008; 95(2): 196 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Calvino, P. M. Tilney, B.-E. v. Wyk, and S. R. Downie A molecular phylogenetic study of southern African Apiaceae Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2006; 93(12): 1828 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, P. W. Fritsch, S. Shi, F. Almeda, B. C. Cruz, and L. M. Kelly Phylogeny and infrageneric classification of Symplocos (Symplocaceae) inferred from DNA sequence data Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2004; 91(11): 1901 - 1914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Simoes, M. E. Endress, T. van der Niet, L. S. Kinoshita, and E. Conti Tribal and intergeneric relationships of Mesechiteae (Apocynoideae, Apocynaceae): evidence from three noncoding plastid DNA regions and morphology Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1409 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Fritsch, F. Almeda, S. S. Renner, A. B. Martins, and B. C. Cruz Phylogeny and circumscription of the near-endemic Brazilian tribe Microlicieae (Melastomataceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2004; 91(7): 1105 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. NEVES and M. F. WATSON Phylogenetic Relationships in Bupleurum (Apiaceae) Based on Nuclear Ribosomal DNA ITS Sequence Data Ann. Bot., April 1, 2004; 93(4): 379 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Kelchner Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1651 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nyffeler Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/ matK and trnL-trnF sequences Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 312 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |