Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Philbrick, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Philbrick, C. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Philbrick, C. T.
(American Journal of Botany. 2000;87:161-175.)
© 2000 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Comparative pollen morphology and ultrastructure of the Callitrichaceae1

Ranessa L. Cooper4,1, Jeffrey M. Osborn5,1 and C. Thomas Philbrick2

1 Division of Science, Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri 63501 USA; and 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, Connecticut 06810 USA

ABSTRACT

The Callitrichaceae are an aquatic family of dicots that include the single, geographically cosmopolitan genus Callitriche. Callitriche contains 40–50 terrestrial, amphibious, and obligately submersed species, and it is the only known genus in the plant kingdom with co-occurring aerial and hydrophilous pollination syndromes. Pollen morphology and ultrastructure were described for 13 Callitriche species using scanning electron and transmission electron microscopy. Representative taxa of each growth form were examined; these included three terrestrial species (C. deflexa, C. peploides, and C. nuttallii), nine amphibious species (C. brutia, C. cophocarpa, C. cophocarpa-stagnalis hybrid, C. cribrosa, C. hamulata, C. heterophylla var. heterophylla, C. lusitanica, C. marginata, and C. trochlearis), and one obligately submersed species (C. truncata). Of the amphibious taxa, C. heterophylla var. heterophylla and C. trochlearis had internal geitonogamy, a type of internal self-fertilization. Pollen from all taxa was spheroidal, small, intectate, and lacked well-defined apertures. Taxa primarily differed with respect to exine thickness, surface ornamentation, and the presence or absence of aperture-like regions. The pollen of terrestrial species, as well as that of C. marginata, had well-developed exines with thick sculptured and basal layers. In general, amphibious taxa produced pollen with distinct, but thinner, exines than that of terrestrial taxa. Pollen of the amphibious taxa with internal geitonogamy had a thicker basal layer than species without internal geitonogamy, whereas the overall exine was reduced in C. hamulata and absent in C. brutia and C. lusitanica. Pollen of the obligately submersed C. truncata also lacked an exine. These palynological data were correlated with growth habits and related pollination biologies, as well as with phylogenetic interpretations of Callitrichaceae. Exine reduction or loss has evolved at least twice in the family, and it is associated with aneuploid reduction in chromosome number.

Key Words: aquatic plants • Callitrichaceae • Callitriche • hydrophily • morphology • pollen • pollination • ultrastructure




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. Merckx, P. Schols, H. M.-v. d. Kamer, P. Maas, S. Huysmans, and E. Smets
Phylogeny and evolution of Burmanniaceae (Dioscoreales) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1684 - 1698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W. S. Judd and R. G. Olmstead
A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(10): 1627 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.