HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weinig, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weinig, C. Agricola Articles by Weinig, C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Limits to adaptive plasticity: temperature and photoperiod influence shade-avoidance responses¹

⁰ Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA

In plants, the ratio of red to far-red wavelengths (R:FR) reliably indicates neighbor proximity and influences stem elongation. Enhanced elongation increases light interception and fitness under crowded conditions. However, many environmental factors vary simultaneously such that responses to R:FR may be affected by abiotic conditions or maternal environmental conditions. This study examines the effects of temperature, photoperiod, and maternal environment on stem-elongation responses to R:FR. Four populations of Abutilon theophrasti (two from disturbed, weedy areas and two from cornfields) were used in factorial common-garden experiments of temperature x R:FR x population and photoperiod x R:FR x population. Seedling growth of greenhouse- and field-derived seed was compared to evaluate maternal effects. Maternal environment did not alter seedling elongation. Higher temperatures resulted in both a twofold increase in average elongation and increased responsiveness to R:FR. Significant three-way interactions in both experiments demonstrate that population responses to R:FR differ depending on temperature and photoperiod conditions. These results indicate that elongation responses to R:FR are more variable than previously realized. The observed variability in elongation also suggests that the outcome of competitive interactions in the natural environment will depend on ambient temperature, photoperiod length, and population origin.

Key Words: adaptive plasticity • competition • environmental cues • photoperiod • population differentiation • shade-avoidance responses • temperature • R:FR

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Auld, A. A. Agrawal, and R. A. Relyea Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2010; 277(1681): 503 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Warner, P. J. Rudall, and M. W. Frohlich Environmental control of sepalness and petalness in perianth organs of waterlilies: a new Mosaic Theory for the evolutionary origin of a differentiated perianth J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2009; 60(12): 3559 - 3574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Lee, J. L. Remfert, and G. W. Gelembiuk Evolution of Physiological Tolerance and Performance During Freshwater Invasions Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 43(3): 439 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Weinig Phytochrome photoreceptors mediate plasticity to light quality in flowers of the Brassicaceae Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 230 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]