HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Runions, C. J. Articles by Geber, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Runions, C. J. Articles by Geber, M. A. Agricola Articles by Runions, C. J. Articles by Geber, M. A.

Evolution of the self-pollinating flower in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). I. Size and development of floral organs¹

⁰ Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Corson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA

Clarkia xantiana has two subspecies that differ in breeding system: ssp. xantiana, which is outcrossing, and ssp. parviflora, which is self-fertilizing. Outcrossing is the ancestral breeding system for the genus Clarkia. Flowers of ssp. parviflora have characteristics commonly associated with selfing taxa: they are smaller and have little temporal and spatial separation between mature anthers and stigma (dichogamy and herkogamy, respectively). Flower morphology and development were studied in four populations of each subspecies to establish the developmental changes that occurred in the evolution of selfing. In particular, we sought to evaluate the hypothesis that the selfing flower may have arisen as a byproduct of selection for rapid maturation in the arid environment occupied by ssp. parviflora. This hypothesis predicts that development time should be reduced in spp. parviflora relative to ssp. xantiana. We also sought to compare the pattern of covariation of flower morphology and development between subspecies to that within subspecies. Similar within vs. between patterns of covariation could be indicative of developmental or functional constraints on the independent evolution of floral parts. In spite of significant variation among populations within subspecies, the subspecies clearly differ in flower morphology and development. All floral organs, except ovaries, are smaller in ssp. parviflora than in ssp. xantiana. The flower plastochron, the duration of flower development from bud initiation to anthesis, and the duration of protandry are all shorter in ssp. parviflora than in ssp. xantiana. Maximum relative growth rates are higher for all organs in ssp. parviflora than in ssp. xantiana. Thus, progenesis (i.e., via a reduction in development time) is combined with growth acceleration in the evolution of the selfing flower. Since reduced development time and growth acceleration both allow selfing flowers to mature earlier than outcrossing ones, selection for early maturation may have contributed to the evolution of the selfing flower form. The pattern of trait covariation differs within spp. parviflora relative to the patterns within spp. xantiana and between the two subspecies, suggesting that floral parts can and have evolved independently of one another.

Key Words: Clarkia • development • growth rate • heterchrony • outcrossing • progenesis • selfing • trait covariation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. C. Barringer Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2007; 94(9): 1527 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Anderson and J. W. Busch Relaxed pollinator-mediated selection weakens floral integration in self-compatible taxa of Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae) Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2006; 93(6): 860 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Herlihy and C. G. Eckert Evolution of self-fertilization at geographical range margins? A comparison of demographic, floral, and mating system variables in central vs. peripheral populations of Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae) Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2005; 92(4): 744 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. HERRERA Flower Size Variation in Rosmarinus officinalis: Individuals, Populations and Habitats Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Shimizu, J. M. Cork, A. L. Caicedo, C. A. Mays, R. C. Moore, K. M. Olsen, S. Ruzsa, G. Coop, C. D. Bustamante, P. Awadalla, et al. Darwinian Selection on a Selfing Locus Science, December 17, 2004; 306(5704): 2081 - 2084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Mazer, H. Paz, and M. D. Bell Life history, floral development, and mating system in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae): do floral and whole-plant rates of development evolve independently? Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2004; 91(12): 2041 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. S. Armbruster, C. P. H. Mulder, B. G. Baldwin, S. Kalisz, B. Wessa, and H. Nute Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae s.l.) Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2002; 89(1): 37 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]