Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. F.
(American Journal of Botany. 2000;87:1425-1438.)
© 2000 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Reversion of flowering in Glycine Max (Fabaceae)1

Carolyn F. Washburn2,0 and Judith F. Thomas3,0

0 Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7618 USA

Photoperiodic changes, if occurring before a commitment to flowering is established, can alter the morphological pattern of plant development. In this study, Glycine max (L.) Merrill cv. Ransom plants were initially grown under an inductive short-day (SD) photoperiod to promote flower evocation and then transferred to a long-day (LD) photoperiod to delay flower development by reestablishing vegetative growth (SD–LD plants). Some plants were transferred back to SD after 4-LD exposures to repromote flowering (SD–LD–SD plants). Alterations in organ initiation patterns, from floral to vegetative and back to floral, are characteristic of a reversion phenomenon. Morphological features that occurred at the shoot apical meristem in SD, LD, SD–LD, and SD–LD–SD plants were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Reverted plants initiated floral bracts and resumed initiation of trifoliolate leaves in the two-fifths floral phyllotaxy prior to terminal inflorescence development. When these plants matured, leaf-bract intermediates were positioned on the main stem instead of trifoliolate leaves. Plants transferred back to a SD photoperiod flowered earlier than those left in LD conditions. Results indicated that in plants transferred between SDs and LDs, photoperiod can influence organ initiation in florally evoked, but not committed, G. max plants.

Key Words: apical meristem • commitment • Fabaceae • floral development • Glycine max • photoperiod • raceme • reversion • trifoliolate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. Tooke, M. Ordidge, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey
Mechanisms and function of flower and inflorescence reversion
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2005; 56(420): 2587 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.