HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfunder, M. Articles by Roy, B. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pfunder, M. Articles by Roy, B. A. Agricola Articles by Pfunder, M. Articles by Roy, B. A.

Pollinator-mediated interactions between a pathogenic fungus, Uromyces pisi (Pucciniaceae), and its host plant,Euphorbia cyparissias (Euphorbiaceae)¹

⁰ Geobotanical Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Zürichbergstrasse 38,8044 Zürich, Switzerland

ABSTRACT

The plant Euphorbia cyparissias is commonly infected by rust fungi of the species complex Uromyces pisi. When infected, E. cyparissias is unable to flower, but instead is induced by the fungus to form pseudoflowers. Pseudoflowers are rosettes of yellow leaves upon which the fungus presents its gametes in a sweet-smelling fungal nectar. We hypothesized that the fungi, as they are heterothallic, are dependent on insect visitation to cross-fertilize their mating types. We confirmed that insects are required with an insect exclusion experiment. We further hypothesized that pseudoflowers of U. pisi interact with uninfected true host flowers through insects during their period of co-"flowering" in early spring. We conducted artificial array experiments in the field to test whether the two species share insects and whether they influenced each other's insect visitation. Insects moved between true flowers and pseudoflowers, but true flowers received more visits over all. Pseudoflowers and true flowers did not influence each other's visitation rates in mixtures. However, shorter visits were observed on pseudoflowers in mixtures than monocultures, suggesting that true flowers might be competitors for pseudoflowers. Further experiments are needed to determine whether the similarity of pseudoflowers to true flowers is adaptive.

Key Words: competition • facilitation • mating system • mimicry • pollination • pseudoflowers • rust fungi • spermatia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Canto, C. M. Herrera, M. Medrano, R. Perez, and I. M. Garcia Pollinator foraging modifies nectar sugar composition in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae):An experimental test Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 315 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Fordyce The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2377 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kaiser Flowers and Fungi Use Scents to Mimic Each Other Science, February 10, 2006; 311(5762): 806 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lara and J. F. Ornelas Hummingbirds as vectors of fungal spores in Moussonia deppeana (Gesneriaceae): taking advantage of a mutualism? Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2003; 90(2): 262 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]