Am. J. Bot. Botany 2008 Ad
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etnier, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etnier, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Etnier, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S.
(American Journal of Botany. 2000;87:29-32.)
© 2000 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Reorientation of daffodil(Narcissus: Amaryllidaceae) flowers inwind: drag reduction andtorsional flexibility1

Shelley A. Etnier2,0 and Steven Vogel0

0 Department of Zoology, Box 90325, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0325 USA

ABSTRACT

Daffodil flowers extend laterally from the long axes of their stems; as a result, wind on a flower exerts torsional as well as flexural stress on the stem. Stems respond by twisting, and thus flowers reorient to face downwind in moderate winds, in the process reducing their drag by ~30%. This repositioning is facilitated by the stems' relatively low torsional stiffness. Daffodil stems have a ratio of flexural to torsional stiffness of 13.27 ± 0.96 (SD), compared with 8.33 ± 3.20 (SD) for tulip stems, which bear flowers as symmetrical extensions of their long axes, and compared with 1.5 for isotropic, incompressible, circular cylinders.

Key Words: Amaryllidaceae • biomechanics • daffodil • drag • flowers • Narcissus • torsional stiffness • wind




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. A. Etnier and P. J. Villani
Differences in mechanical and structural properties of surface and aerial petioles of the aquatic plant Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa (Nymphaeaceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1067 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. D. H. Sprayberry and T. L. Daniel
Flower tracking in hawkmoths: behavior and energetics
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2007; 210(1): 37 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Read and A. Stokes
Plant biomechanics in an ecological context
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1546 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Butler and A. S. Johnson
Are melanized feather barbs stronger?
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2004; 207(2): 285 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
O. Speck
Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1253 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
S. A. Etnier
Twisting and Bending of Biological Beams: Distribution of Biological Beams in a Stiffness Mechanospace
Biol. Bull., August 1, 2003; 205(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. E. Armstrong
Fringe Science: are the corollas of Nymphoides (Menyanthaceae) flowers adapted for surface tension interactions?
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 362 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
S. A. Etnier
Flexural and Torsional Stiffness in Multi-Jointed Biological Beams
Biol. Bull., February 1, 2001; 200(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.