HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (82) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Renner, S. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Renner, S. S. Agricola Articles by Renner, S. S.

Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: evidence from molecular and morphological data¹

Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121; and The Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri 63166

The order Laurales comprises a few indisputed core constituents, namely Gomortegaceae, Hernandiaceae, Lauraceae, and Monimiaceae sensu lato, and an equal number of families that have recently been included in, or excluded from, the order, namely Amborellaceae, Calycanthaceae, Chloranthaceae, Idiospermaceae, and Trimeniaceae. In addition, the circumscription of the second largest family in the order, the Monimiaceae, has been problematic. I conducted two analyses, one on 82 rbcL sequences representing all putative Laurales and major lineages of basal angiosperms to clarify the composition of the order and to determine the relationships of the controversal families, and the other on a concatenated matrix of sequences from 28 taxa and six plastid genome regions (rbcL, rpl16, trnT-trnL, trnL-trnF, atpB-rbcL, and psbA-trnH) that together yielded 898 parsimony-informative characters. Fifteen morphological characters that play a key role in the evolution and classification of Laurales were analyzed on the most parsimonious molecular trees as well as being included directly in the analysis in a total evidence approach. The resulting trees strongly support the monophyly of the core Laurales (as listed above) plus Calycanthaceae and Idiospermaceae. Trimeniaceae form a clade with Illiciaceae, Schisandraceae, and Austrobaileyaceae, whereas Amborellaceae and Chloranthaceae represent isolated clades that cannot be placed securely based on rbcL alone. Within Laurales, the deepest split is between Calycanthaceae (including Idiospermaceae) and the remaining six families, which in turn form two clades, the Siparunaceae (Atherospermataceae-Gomortegaceae) and the Hernandiaceae (Monimiaceae s.str. [sensu stricto]-Lauraceae). Monimiaceae clearly are polyphyletic as long as they include Atherospermataceae and Siparunaceae. Several morphological character state changes are congruent with the molecular tree: (1) Calycanthaceae have disulculate tectate-columellate pollen, while their sister clade has inaperturate thin-exined pollen, with the exception of Atherospermataceae, which have columellate but meridionosulcate or disulcate pollen. (2) Calycanthaceae have two ventral ovules while their sister clade has solitary ovules. Within this sister clade, the Hernandiaceae (Lauraceae-Monimiaceae) have apical ovules, while the Siparunaceae (Atherospermataceae-Gomortegaceae) are inferred to ancestrally have basal ovules, a condition lost in Gomortega, the only lauralean genus with a syncarpous ovary. (3) Calycanthaceae lack floral nectaries (except for isolated nectarogeneous fields on the inner tepals), while their sister clade ancestrally has paired nectar glands on the filaments. Filament glands were independently lost in higher Monimiaceae and in Siparunaceae concomitant with pollinator changes away from nectar-foraging flies and bees to non-nectar feeding beetles and gall midges. (4) Disporangiate stamens with anthers dehiscing by two apically hinged valves are ancestral in Siparunaceae-(Atherospermataceae-Gomortegaceae) and evolved independently within Hernandiaceae and Lauraceae. Depending on the correct placement of Calycanthaceae-like fossil flowers, tetrasporangiate anthers with valvate dehiscence (with the valves laterally hinged) may be ancestral in Laurales and lost in modern Calycanthaceae and Monimiaceae.

Key Words: Atherospermataceae • Calycanthaceae • Gomortegaceae • Hernandiaceae • Lauraceae • Monimiaceae • Siparunaceae • Trimeniaceae

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. von Balthazar, K. R. Pedersen, P. R. Crane, M. Stampanoni, and E. M. Friis Potomacanthus lobatus gen. et sp. nov., a new flower of probable Lauraceae from the Early Cretaceous (Early to Middle Albian) of eastern North America Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2007; 94(12): 2041 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.-C. Yuan, Y.-B. Luo, L. B. Thien, J.-H. Fan, H.-L. Xu, and Z.-D. Chen Pollination of Schisandra henryi (Schisandraceae) by Female, Pollen-eating Megommata Species (Cecidomyiidae, Diptera) in South-central China Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 451 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. L. Crepet, K. C. Nixon, and M. A. Gandolfo An extinct calycanthoid taxon, Jerseyanthus calycanthoides , from the Late Cretaceous of New Jersey Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2005; 92(9): 1475 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Mitchell and P. K. Diggle The evolution of unisexual flowers: morphological and functional convergence results from diverse developmental transitions Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2005; 92(7): 1068 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kress, K. J. Wurdack, E. A. Zimmer, L. A. Weigt, and D. H. Janzen Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8369 - 8374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Soltis and D. E. Soltis The origin and diversification of angiosperms Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1614 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Williams and W. E. Friedman The four-celled female gametophyte of Illicium (Illiciaceae; Austrobaileyales): implications for understanding the origin and early evolution of monocots, eumagnoliids,and eudicots Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 332 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Stellari, M. A. Jaramillo, and E. M. Kramer Evolution of the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA Lineages of MADS-Box-Containing Genes in the Basal Angiosperms Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2004; 21(3): 506 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. W. Hilu, T. Borsch, K. Muller, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, V. Savolainen, M. W. Chase, M. P. Powell, L. A. Alice, R. Evans, et al. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2003; 90(12): 1758 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Kelchner Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1651 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mathews and M. J. Donoghue The Root of Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from Duplicate Phytochrome Genes Science, October 29, 1999; 286(5441): 947 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text]