HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Comstock, J. P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Comstock, J. P Agricola Articles by Comstock, J. P

Why Canny's theory doesn't hold water¹

Boyce Thompson Institute, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14853-1801

A critique of Martin Canny's theory of water transport supported by tissue pressure is given with reference to basic principles of cellular water relations and biomechanics. It is shown that the application of tissue pressure in Canny's theory is neither internally consistent nor compatible with basic biophysics. Canny's translation of tissue pressure into an altered steady-state pressure in the xylem conduits has no defensible mechanism, relying instead on untenable action-at-a-distance and poor definitions. Tissue pressure itself, as defined by Canny and illustrated by the example of a turgid leaf, may well exist. However, it cannot function in whole-plant processes as envisioned by Canny, nor can it exist in the magnitude his theory would require. Rigid outer tissue layers containing internal pressures of the magnitude postulated by Canny would require a tensile strength quite incompatible with the observed biological materials. A simple application of La Place's Law illustrates that this is an issue of scale and that the turgor generated by osmotic potentials must be balanced primarily at the cellular level, and not the tissue level.

Key Words: cohesion theory • compensating pressure theory • tissue pressure • water transport

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Sperry, V. Stiller, and U. G. Hacke Xylem Hydraulics and the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum: Opportunities and Unresolved Issues Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1362 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Kikuta, P. Hietz, and H. Richter Vulnerability curves from conifer sapwood sections exposed over solutions with known water potentials J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2003; 54(390): 2149 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. SCHECKLER and J. GALTIER Tyloses and Ecophysiology of the Early Carboniferous Progymnosperm Tree Protopitys buchiana Ann. Bot., May 1, 2003; 91(6): 739 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Canny Contributions to the debate on water transport Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2001; 88(1): 43 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. Cochard, C. Bodet, T. Améglio, and P. Cruiziat Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy Observations of Vessel Content during Transpiration in Walnut Petioles. Facts or Artifacts? Plant Physiology, November 1, 2000; 124(3): 1191 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text]