Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (60)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, P. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, P. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Green, P. B
(American Journal of Botany. 1999;86:1059-1076.)
© 1999 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Expression of pattern in plants: combining molecular and calculus-based biophysical paradigms1

Paul B Green2

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Pattern formation in plant meristems occurs across a broad scale. At the topographical level (large scale), tissue folding in the meristem is responsible for the initiation of new organs in specific phyllotactic patterns and also determines organ shape. At the cellular level (small scale), oriented cell division and microtubule-based cellulose reinforcement control cell pattern and growth direction. I argue here that structural specification at each scale is highly efficient if the pertinent gene activity is manifested in two complementary biophysical categories. At large scale, one category is the tendency of the formative tissue to fold with a certain spatial periodicity determined by its material properties (e.g., bending stiffness from cellulose content). This latent tendency is formalized in a differential equation for physical buckling. The second category at this scale comprises boundary conditions that specify how the latent tendency is manifested as topography: whether tissue humps occur as whorls or Fibonacci spirals. This versatile combinatorial format accounts for the relative stability of alternative organ patterning as well as alternative organ shaping (e.g., stamens vs. carpels). It also accounts for the structural shifts seen in normal development and after mutation or chemical/physical intervention. At small scale, the latent differential activity is the tendency for groups of dividing cells to co-align their cytoskeletons. The curvature of the surface opposes this tendency. The least curved part of a new primordium is its quasicylindrical midportion. There, by aligning microtubules and cellulose coherently around the organ, a new growth direction is set. Thus large-scale buckling produces curvature variation, which, in turn, affects the localization and orientation of the cytoskeleton. This scheme for the coherent production of diverse geometrical features, involving calculus at two structural levels, is supported by complex organogenetic responses to simple physical intervention. Also, many morphological alternatives, wild type vs. mutant, reflect single changes in parameters in this differential-integral format.

Key Words: biophysics; cell pattern; cellulose reinforcement; cytoskeleton; mechanical buckling; pattern formation; phyllotaxis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. Kwiatkowska
Flowering and apical meristem growth dynamics
J. Exp. Bot., February 5, 2008; (2008) erm290v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. M. Holloway and L. G. Harrison
Pattern Selection in Plants: Coupling Chemical Dynamics to Surface Growth in Three Dimensions
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 361 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
E. M. Kramer
Computer models of auxin transport: a review and commentary
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2008; 59(1): 45 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. J. Fleming
The co-ordination of cell division, differentiation and morphogenesis in the shoot apical meristem: a perspective
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. R. Smyth
Morphogenesis of Flowers--Our Evolving View
PLANT CELL, February 1, 2005; 17(2): 330 - 341.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. Kwiatkowska
Structural integration at the shoot apical meristem: models, measurements, and experiments
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1277 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
L. G. HARRISON and P. VON ADERKAS
Spatially Quantitative Control of the Number of Cotyledons in a Clonal Population of Somatic Embryos of Hybrid Larch Larix x leptoeuropaea
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2004; 93(4): 423 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F. Baluska, J. Samaj, P. Wojtaszek, D. Volkmann, and D. Menzel
Cytoskeleton-Plasma Membrane-Cell Wall Continuum in Plants. Emerging Links Revisited
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2003; 133(2): 482 - 491.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. E. Byrne, A. T. Groover, J. R. Fontana, and R. A. Martienssen
Phyllotactic pattern and stem cell fate are determined by the Arabidopsis homeobox gene BELLRINGER
Development, September 1, 2003; 130(17): 3941 - 3950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W. J. Kelly and T. J. Cooke
Geometrical relationships specifying the phyllotactic pattern of aquatic plants
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1131 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas
The Bio-Logic and machinery of plant morphogenesis
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2003; 90(4): 515 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Gielis
A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 333 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
U. Nath, B. C. W. Crawford, R. Carpenter, and E. Coen
Genetic Control of Surface Curvature
Science, February 28, 2003; 299(5611): 1404 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. E. Cleland
Unlocking the mysteries of leaf primordia formation
PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 10981 - 10982.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Hammer
Lateral growth patterns in the Cladoniaceae
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2001; 88(5): 788 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.