Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golubov, J.
Right arrow Articles by Montaña, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golubov, J.
Right arrow Articles by Montaña, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Golubov, J.
Right arrow Articles by Montaña, C.
(American Journal of Botany. 1999;86:955-963.)
© 1999 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Why be a honeyless honey mesquite? Reproduction and mating system of nectarful and nectarless individuals1

Jordan Golubov 2, 4, Luis E. Eguiarte 2 , María C. Mandujano 2, 4, Jorge López-Portillo 3 and Carlos Montaña 3

2Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Aptdo. Postal 70-275, Cd. Universitaria, UNAM 04510, México D.F.; and 3Instituto de Ecología A. C., Aptdo. Postal 63, C. P. 91000, Xalapa Veracruz, México

Populations of Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana in the Chihuahuan desert have a fixed dimorphic system of nectar production in which half the individuals produce nectar (are nectarful) and the other half are nectarless. We analyzed the impact of nectar production on different estimates of fitness, comparing nectarful against nectarless individuals in size, mating system, seed traits, and fruit set in a 1-ha scrubland. Of the reproductive individuals (358), 46% were nectarful and 54% were nectarless. Neither tree size nor flowering phenology differed between nectar morphs. Fixation indices (F) for both progeny (F = -0.2) and adults (F = -0.45) were negative, and high heterozygosities were found in adults and progeny (H = 0.45). No differences were found between nectar morphs for F, H, and single (ts = 1.1) and multilocus (tm = 1.03) outcrossing rates. Controlled pollinations showed differences between selfing and control treatments with no differences between nectar morphs. Nectarless individuals produced significantly more pollen grains than did nectar producers, but all other measured floral traits showed no differences. Nectarful trees were visited by pollinators 21 times more often and had a significantly higher overall fruit set than did nectarless trees. No differences between nectar morphs in seed mass or in percentage seed germination were found, but heavier seeds tended to have higher heterozygosities. Both morphs had similar success as females, but nectarless trees had ~7% higher male function. We discuss three possible scenarios for the evolution of the fixed dimorphism in nectar production, two involving unstable phases (substitution of one morph by the other, and evolution towards dioecy) and one stable scenario (maintenance of the dimorphic system).

Key Words: floral traits • Leguminosae • mating systems • nectar production • outcrossing rates • pollination • polymorphism • Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana • seed traits




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. M. FERRER, L. E. EGUIARTE, and C. MONTANA
Genetic structure and outcrossing rates in Flourensia cernua (Asteraceae) growing at different densities in the South-western Chihuahuan Desert
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2004; 94(3): 419 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. V. Casiva, J. C. Vilardi, A. M. Cialdella, and B. O. Saidman
Mating system and population structure of Acacia aroma and A. macracantha (Fabaceae)
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 58 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.