Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starr, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Starr, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, B. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Starr, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, B. A.
(American Journal of Botany. 1999;86:563-577.)
© 1999 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

The phylogenetic position of Carex section Phyllostachys and its implications for phylogeny and subgeneric circumscription in Carex (Cyperaceae)1

Julian R. Starr 2, 4, Randall J. Bayer 3, 5 and Bruce A. Ford 2

2Department of Botany, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2 Canada; and 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9 Canada

Wide speculation surrounds the origin and phylogenetic relationships of the most highly reduced sections in the genus Carex. In order to gain a better understanding of phylogeny in Carex, the relationship of the reduced sect. Phyllostachys to 12 putatively related sections, representing all four subgenera (Primocarex, Indocarex, Carex, Vignea), was inferred from sequences of the ITS (internal transcribed spacer) region of nrDNA. Phylogenetic reconstructions identified two main clades: (1) a "compound" clade composed of sections from subg. Indocarex, Primocarex, and a portion of subg. Carex, and (2) a "reduced" clade consisting of sections from subg. Carex (Phyllostachys) and Primocarex (Filifoliae and Firmiculmes). Subgenus Indocarex was paraphyletic within the "compound" clade supporting classifications that have merged it within a wider subg. Indocarex/Carex/Primocarex line. Subgenus Primocarex was polyphyletic. This result was consistent with theories that extreme reduction has occurred along several different evolutionary lines in Carex. Phylogenetic theories inferred from the presence or abnormal growth of the rachilla were not supported by tree topologies. Difficult sectional circumscriptions, such as the separation of sections Laxiflorae and Careyanae, were strongly upheld by sequence data. The ITS region is an effective tool for defining sectional limits and for estimating relationships among sections in Carex, but does not provide enough phylogenetic information to fully resolve relationships below the sectional level.

Key Words: Carex • Cyperaceae • ITS phylogeny • sectional delimitation • subgeneric circumscription




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Escudero, P. Vargas, V. Valcarcel, and M. Luceno
Strait of Gibraltar: an effective gene-flow barrier for wind-pollinated Carex helodes (Cyperaceae) as revealed by DNA sequences, AFLP, and cytogenetic variation
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2008; 95(6): 745 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Vellend, M. J. Lechowicz, and M. J. Waterway
Germination and establishment of forest sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae): tests for home-site advantage and effects of leaf litter
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2000; 87(10): 1517 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.