HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Larson, B. M. H. Articles by Barrett, S. C. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Larson, B. M. H. Articles by Barrett, S. C. H. Agricola Articles by Larson, B. M. H. Articles by Barrett, S. C. H. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

The pollination ecology of buzz-pollinated Rhexia virginica (Melastomataceae)¹

Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3B2

We examined the function of floral traits associated with buzz pollination through studies of Rhexia virginica (Melastomataceae) in the Muskoka region of Ontario, Canada. Controlled pollinations demonstrated that the species is self-compatible, but dependent on insects for pollen transfer. Bumble bees made 82 and 90% of observed insect visits to R. virginica in 1996 and 1997, respectively, and effectively buzzed flowers. Buzz pollination did not appear to be highly "specialized" since various species of bumble bee were capable of pollination, and pollen transfer efficiency appeared to be relatively low. Experimental manipulations provided little support for the hypothesis that the yellow color of melastome anthers mimics abundant pollen, thereby deceiving pollinators to visit regardless of whether most pollen has been removed. Fruit set averaged 52.6% among populations, owing largely to infrequent pollinator visits and pollen limitation. Flowers of R. virginica were infertile after a single day of anthesis, but petals were subsequently maintained for 1–2 d and stamens underwent a color change from bright yellow to red. Second-day flowers may function to increase floral display size and hence fertility, without a concomitant increase in pollen discounting. Studies of bumble bee foraging behavior and correlates of seed set provided indirect support for this hypothesis.

Key Words: bumble bee behavior • floral color change • Melastomataceae • phenology • pollen limitation • Rhexia virginica • specialization

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Matsuki, R. Tateno, M. Shibata, and Y. Isagi Pollination efficiencies of flower-visiting insects as determined by direct genetic analysis of pollen origin Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 925 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Clausing and S. S. Renner Molecular phylogenetics of Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae: implications for character evolution Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2001; 88(3): 486 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text]