Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elle,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elle,
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elle,
(American Journal of Botany. 1999;86:278-286.)
© 1999 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Sex allocation and reproductive success in the andromonoecious perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). I. Female success1

Elizabeth Elle2

Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0231

Relative allocation of resources to growth vs. reproduction has long been known to be an important determinant of reproductive success. The importance of variation in allocation to different structures within reproductive allocation is somewhat less clear. This study was designed to elucidate the importance of allocation to vegetative vs. reproductive functions, and allocation within reproductive functions (sex allocation), to realized female success in an andromonoecious plant, Solanum carolinense. Allocation measurements were taken on plants in experimental arrays exposed to natural pollination conditions. These measurements included total flower number, the proportion of flowers that were male, flower size, and vegetative size. Flower number explained the majority of the variation among individuals in their success—that is, there was strong selection for increased flower production. There was also selection to decrease the proportion of flowers that were male, but neither flower size nor vegetative size (a measure of overall resource availability) were direct determinants of female success. After Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons, most phenotypic correlations among the traits measured were nonsignificant. Thus, in this andromonoecious species there is not a strong relationship between resource availability (vegetative size) and female success, and female success is instead determined by the relative production of the two different flower types.

Key Words: Bateman's principle • reproductive success • resource allocation • sex allocation • Solanaceae • Solanum carolinense




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Quesada-Aguilar, S. Kalisz, and T.-L. Ashman
Flower morphology and pollinator dynamics in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae): implications for the evolution of andromonoecy
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 974 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. S. Miller and P. K. Diggle
Correlated evolution of fruit size and sexual expression in andromonoecious Solanum sections Acanthophora and Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1706 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. M. Snyder and J. H. Richards
Floral phenology and compatibility of sawgrass, Cladium jamaicense (Cyperaceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2005; 92(4): 736 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. L. Parachnowitsch and E. Elle
Variation in sex allocation and male-female trade-offs in six populations of Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae s.l.)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2004; 91(8): 1200 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. M. Caruso, S. B. Peterson, and C. E. Ridley
Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1333 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.