HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (35) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Freudenstein, J. Articles by Rasmussen, F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Freudenstein, J. Articles by Rasmussen, F. Agricola Articles by Freudenstein, J. Articles by Rasmussen, F.

What does morphology tell us about orchid relationships?—a cladistic analysis¹

Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242; and Botanical Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Gothersgade 140,1123 Copenhagen K, Denmark

A cladistic analysis of Orchidaceae was undertaken for 98 genera using 71 morphological apomorphies based on a reconsideration of previous character analyses and newly discovered variation. The equally weighted analysis found 60 000 most parsimonious trees with low consistency (CI = 0.29) but high retention (RI = 0.83). The strict consensus reveals a significant amount of structure, and most traditionally recognized subfamilies are supported as monophyletic, including the Apostasioideae, Cypripedioideae, Spiranthoideae, and Epidendroideae. Orchidoideae in the broad sense are paraphyletic, giving rise to spiranthoids. Vanilloids are sister to epidendroids, although exhibiting several states otherwise found only in clearly basal groups, such as Apostasioideae. The nonvandoid epidendroids are poorly resolved, due to a high degree of homoplasy. The vandoids appear to be monophyletic, contrary to recent molecular evidence, possibly due to repeated parallel development of the vandoid character suite. The importance of vegetative characters as evidence putatively independent from floral features is demonstrated in the placement of Tropidia. Implied weighting analysis of these data resulted in similar patterns at high levels, although the Orchidoideae and Spiranthoideae may each be monophyletic and the nonvandoid epidendroids are more resolved. The high degree of structure implied in previous orchid classifications must be reconsidered, given the poor resolution at lower levels in the present trees.

Key Words: cladistics • classification • morphology • Orchidaceae • systematics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. B. LUMAGA, S. COZZOLINO, and A. KOCYAN Exine Micromorphology of Orchidinae (Orchidoideae, Orchidaceae): Phylogenetic Constraints or Ecological Influences? Ann. Bot., July 1, 2006; 98(1): 237 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Carlsward, W. M. Whitten, N. H. Williams, and B. Bytebier Molecular phylogenetics of Vandeae (Orchidaceae) and the evolution of leaflessness Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2006; 93(5): 770 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. van den Berg, D. H. Goldman, J. V. Freudenstein, A. M. Pridgeon, K. M. Cameron, and M. W. Chase An overview of the phylogenetic relationships within Epidendroideae inferred from multiple DNA regions and recircumscription of Epidendreae and Arethuseae (Orchidaceae) Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2005; 92(4): 613 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Freudenstein, C. van den Berg, D. H. Goldman, P. J. Kores, M. Molvray, and M. W. Chase An expanded plastid DNA phylogeny of Orchidaceae and analysis of jackknife branch support strategy Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 149 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Salazar, M. W. Chase, M. A. Soto Arenas, and M. Ingrouille Phylogenetics of Cranichideae with emphasis on Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Orchidoideae): evidence from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2003; 90(5): 777 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Freudenstein, E. M. Harris, and F. N. Rasmussen The evolution of anther morphology in orchids: incumbent anthers, superposed pollinia, and the vandoid complex Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2002; 89(11): 1747 - 1755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Pridgeon, R. Solano, and M. W. Chase Phylogenetic relationships in Pleurothallidinae (Orchidaceae): combined evidence from nuclear and plastid DNA sequences Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2001; 88(12): 2286 - 2308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Kores, M. Molvray, P. H. Weston, S. D. Hopper, A. P. Brown, K. M. Cameron, and M. W. Chase A phylogenetic analysis of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on plastid DNA sequence data Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2001; 88(10): 1903 - 1914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Kristiansen, F. N. Rasmussen, and H. N. Rasmussen Seedlings of Neuwiedia (Orchidaceae subfamily Apostasioideae) have typical orchidaceous mycotrophic protocorms Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2001; 88(5): 956 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Whitten, N. H. Williams, and M. W. Chase Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2000; 87(12): 1842 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text]