Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelmann, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by James, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelmann, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by James, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelmann, T.
(American Journal of Botany. 1999;86:198-207.)
© 1999 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Ontogenetic differences in mesophyll structure and chlorophyll distribution in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus (Myrtaceae)1

Shelley A. James 2,3, 4, William K. Smith 2 and Thomas C. Vogelmann 2

2Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071-3165; and 3Department of Botany, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W.A. 6907, Australia

Mesophyll structure has been associated with the photosynthetic performance of leaves via the regulation of internal light and CO2 profiles. Differences in mesophyll structure and chlorophyll distribution within three ontogenetically different leaf types of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus were investigated. Juvenile leaves are blue-grey in color, dorsiventral (adaxial palisade layer only), hypostomatous, and approximately horizontal in orientation. In contrast, adult leaves are dark green in color, isobilateral (adaxial and abaxial palisade), amphistomatous, and nearly vertical in orientation. The transitional leaf type has structural features that appear intermediate between the juvenile and adult leaves. The ratio of mesophyll cell surface area per unit leaf surface area (Ames/A) of juvenile leaves was maximum at the base of a single, adaxial palisade layer and declined through the spongy mesophyll. Chlorophyll a + b content showed a coincident pattern, while the chlorophyll a:b ratio declined linearly from the adaxial to abaxial epidermis. In comparison, the mesophyll of adult leaves had a bimodal distribution of Ames/A, with maxima occurring beneath both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces within the first layer of multiple palisade layers. The distribution of chlorophyll a + b content had a similar pattern, although the maximum ratio of chlorophyll a:b occurred immediately beneath the adaxial and abaxial epidermis. The matching distributions of Ames/A and chlorophyll provide further evidence that mesophyll structure may act to influence photosynthetic performance. These changes in internal leaf structure at different life stages of E. globulus may be an adaptation for increased xeromorphy under increasing light exposure experienced from the seedling to adult tree, similar to the characteristics reported for different species according to sunlight exposure and water availability within their native habitats.

Key Words: Ames/A • chlorophyll • Eucalyptus • leaf structure • light • Myrtaceae • palisade mesophyll • Vmes/V




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. TERASHIMA, T. ARAYA, S.-I. MIYAZAWA, K. SONE, and S. YANO
Construction and Maintenance of the Optimal Photosynthetic Systems of the Leaf, Herbaceous Plant and Tree: an Eco-developmental Treatise
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 507 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. R. Slaton, E. Raymond Hunt Jr., and W. K. Smith
Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2001; 88(2): 278 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.