Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Velásquez Runk, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Velásquez Runk, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Velásquez Runk, J. L.
(American Journal of Botany. 1999;86:39-55.)
© 1999 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept1

W. Scott Armbruster7,a, Verónica S. Di Stiliob, John D. Tuxill8,c, T. Christopher Flores9,d and Julie L. Velásquez Runke

a Department of Botany, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway, and Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7000; and b Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-5810; and c Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; and d Department of Biology, University of Missouri, 8001 Natural Bridge Rd, St. Louis, Missouri 63121; and e School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

Nearly forty years ago R. L. Berg proposed that plants with specialized pollination ecology evolve genetic and developmental systems that decouple floral morphology from phenotypic variation in vegetative traits. These species evolve separate floral and vegetative trait clusters, or as she termed them, "correlation pleiades." The predictions of this hypothesis have been generally supported, but only a small sample of temperate-zone herb and grass species has been tested. To further evaluate this hypothesis, especially its applicability to plants of other growth forms, we examined the patterns of phenotypic variation and covariation of floral and vegetative traits in nine species of Neotropical plants. We recognized seven specific predictions of Berg's hypothesis. Our results supported some predictions but not others. Species with specialized pollination systems usually had floral traits decoupled (weak correlation; Canna and Eichornia) or buffered (relationship with shallow proportional slope; Calathea and Canna) from variation in vegetative traits. However, the same trend was also observed in three species with unspecialized pollination systems (Echinodorus, Muntingia, and Wedelia). One species with unspecialized pollination (Croton) and one wind-pollinated species (Cyperus) showed no decoupling or buffering, as predicted. While species with specialized pollination usually showed lower coefficients of variation for floral traits than vegetative traits (as predicted), the same was also true of species with unspecialized or wind pollination (unlike our prediction). Species with specialized pollination showed less variation in floral traits than did species with unspecialized or wind pollination, as predicted. However, the same was true of the corresponding vegetative traits, which was unexpected. Also in contrast to our prediction, plants with specialized pollination systems did not exhibit tighter phenotypic integration of floral characters than did species with generalized pollination systems. We conclude that the patterns of morphological integration among floral traits and between floral and vegetative traits tend to be species specific, not easily predicted from pollination ecology, and generally more complicated than R. L. Berg envisaged.

Key Words: adaptation • correlated evolution • correlation pleiades • evolution • floral traits • genetic correlation • natural selection • pollination • quantitative genetics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
V. R. Chalcoff, C. Ezcurra, and M. A. Aizen
Uncoupled Geographical Variation between Leaves and Flowers in a South-Andean Proteaceae
Ann. Bot., April 23, 2008; (2008) mcn057v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. S. Miller and P. K. Diggle
Correlated evolution of fruit size and sexual expression in andromonoecious Solanum sections Acanthophora and Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1706 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
I. A. Anderson and J. W. Busch
Relaxed pollinator-mediated selection weakens floral integration in self-compatible taxa of Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae)
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2006; 93(6): 860 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. J. Mazer, H. Paz, and M. D. Bell
Life history, floral development, and mating system in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae): do floral and whole-plant rates of development evolve independently?
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2004; 91(12): 2041 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. M. Sanchez-Lafuente
Floral variation in the generalist perennial herb Paeonia broteroi (Paeoniaceae): differences between regions with different pollinators and herbivores
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2002; 89(8): 1260 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. J. Murren, N. Pendleton, and M. Pigliucci
Evolution of phenotypic integration in Brassica (Brassicaceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2002; 89(4): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.