Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, T.

American Journal of Botany, Vol 85, 1166, Copyright © 1998 by Botanical Society of America, Inc.


REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY

Is relative pollen production or removal a good predictor of relative male fitness? An experimental exploration with a wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana, Rosaceae)

T Ashman

Understanding plant reproduction requires knowledge of genetic contributions through pollen and seeds. Since direct genetic assessments of fitness through pollen are often intractable, reproductive ecologists use components of male fitness such as pollen production and pollen removal as surrogates tot paternity. However, we know little of the strength of the relationship between these components and actual paternity. Here, I report on a study undertaken to examine the relationship of pollen production and removal with paternity in Fragaria virginiana, a wild strawberry. A morphological marker was used to track paternity in experimental arrays exposed to native pollinators. Relative pellen production proved to be a poor predictor of relative paternity in most arrays, and over all arrays there was no significant correlation between relative paternity and relative pellen production. In contrast, relative pollen removed correlated significantly and positively with proportion of seeds sired, suggesting that a plant's contribution to the pool of removed pellen is a good predictor of its male reproductive success. Deviations from expected paternity based on relative pollen removal suggest a systematic overestimation of the siring success of plants with low pollen removal. And, in at least one specific case, low pellen removal may be explained by delayed anther dehiscence, which could lower the effectiveness of the removed pellen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
L. F. Delph and T.-L. Ashman
Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute?
Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 465 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. E. Giblin
Variation in floral longevity between populations of Campanula rotundifolia (Campanulaceae) in response to fitness accrual rate manipulation
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2005; 92(10): 1714 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. N. Hayes, J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson
A comparison of male and female responses to inbreeding in Cucurbita pepo subsp. texana (Cucurbitaceae)
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
I. Dohzono, K. Suzuki, and J. Murata
Temporal changes in calyx tube length of Clematis stans (Ranunculaceae): a strategy for pollination by two bumble bee species with different proboscis lengths
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2004; 91(12): 2051 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. Niovi Jones and J. S. Reithel
Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2001; 88(3): 447 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.