Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molina-Freaner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Molina-Freaner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Molina-Freaner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.

American Journal of Botany, Vol 85, 1082, Copyright © 1998 by Botanical Society of America, Inc.


STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT

Stem biomechanics of three columnar cacti from the Sonoran Desert

F Molina-Freaner, C Tinoco-Ojanguren and KJ Niklas

The allometric relationship of stem length L with respect to mean stem diameter D was determined for 80 shoots of each of three columnar cactus species (Stenocereus thurberi, Lophocereus schottii, and S. gummosus) to determine whether this relationship accords with that predicted by each of three contending models purporting to describe the mechanical architecture of vertical shoots (i.e., geometric, stress, and elastic similitude, which predict L proportional to D(alpha), with alpha = 1/1, 1/2, and 2/3, respectively). In addition, anatomical, physical, and biomechanical stem properties were measured to determine how the stems of these three species maintain their elastic stability as they increase in size. Reduced major axis regression of L with respect to D showed that alpha = 2.82 ± 0.14 for S. thurberi, 2.32 ± 0.19 for L. schottii, and 4.21 ± 0.31 for S. gummosus. Thus, the scaling exponents for the allometry of L differed significantly from that predicted by each of the three biomechanical models. In contrast, these exponents were similar to that for the allometry previously reported for saguaro. Analyses of biomechanical data derived from bending tests performed on 30 stems selected from each of the three species indicated that the bulk stem tissue stiffness was roughly proportional to L2, while stem flexural rigidity (i.e., the ability to resist a bending force) scaled roughly as L3. Stem length was significantly and positively correlated with the volume fraction of wood, while regression analysis of the pooled data from the three species (i.e., 90 stems) indicated that bulk tissue stiffness scaled roughly as the 5/3-power of the volume fraction of wood in stems. These data were interpreted to indicate that wood served as the major stiffening agent in stems and that this tissue accumulates at a sufficient rate to afford unusually high scaling exponents tot stem length with respect to stem diameter (i.e., disproportionately large increments of stem length with respect to increments in stem diameter). Nevertheless, the safety factor against the elastic failure of stems (computed on the basis of the critical buckling height divided by actual stem length) decreased with increasing stem size tot each species, even though each species maintained an average safety factor equal to two. We speculate that the apparent upper limit to plant height calculated for each species may serve as a biomechanical mechanism for vegetative propagation and the establishment of dense plant colonies by means of extreme stem flexure and ultimate breakage, especially for S. gummosus.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. M. Chapotin, J. H. Razanameharizaka, and N. M. Holbrook
A biomechanical perspective on the role of large stem volume and high water content in baobab trees (Adansonia spp.; Bombacaceae)
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2006; 93(9): 1251 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas, F. Molina-Freaner, C. Tinoco-Ojanguren, C. J. Hogan Jr., and D. J. Paolillo Jr
On the mechanical properties of the rare endemic cactus Stenocereus eruca and the related species S. gummosus
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2003; 90(5): 663 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Gielis
A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 333 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. G. Bobich and P. S. Nobel
Biomechanics and anatomy of cladode junctions for two Opuntia (Cactaceae) species and their hybrid
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2001; 88(3): 391 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas, F. Molina-Freaner, and C. Tinoco-Ojanguren
Biomechanics of the columnar cactus Pachycereus pringlei
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 1999; 86(6): 767 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.