American Journal of Botany, Vol 85, 741, Copyright © 1998 by Botanical Society of America, Inc.

INVITED SPECIAL PAPER

Primary classification and phylogeny of the Polemoniaceae, with comments on molecular cladistics

V Grant

The system of classification of the Polemoniaceae currently in use was published by Grant in 1959. Much new evidence concerning relationships in the family has been obtained by numerous workers since 1959, and the old system is in need of revision. A revised system down to the genus level, based on conventional and unconventional characters, including molecular evidence, is presented here. Nineteen genera are grouped into eight tribes and two subfamilies. Three new tribes are described: Acanthogilieae, Loeselieae, and Leptodactyloneae. Several genera are transferred to new groups. The phylogeny of the family is discussed in the light of both the older and new evidence. The approach used in constructing both the 1959 and new systems is that of evolutionary systematics. Two recent (1996, 1997) family-wide surveys of cpDNA and rDNA use cladistic methods of analysis to arrive at sets of major groups. Some of this molecular evidence has been adopted for the present revised system. However, much incongruence still exists between the new sets of clades, on the one hand, and the present revised system or the still-viable parts of the 1959 system on the other hand. The incongruences call for an examination and comparison of the contrasting methods of evolutionary systematics and molecular cladistics. A fundamental flaw in the 1996 and 1997 treatments is the attempt to classify plants on the basis of single-gene gene trees.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. S Ford, J. Lee, B. G Baldwin, and L. D Gottlieb Species divergence and relationships in Stephanomeria (Compositae): PgiC phylogeny compared to prior biosystematic studies Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2006; 93(3): 480 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Grant Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1263 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Ferguson and R. K. Jansen A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of eastern Phlox (Polemoniaceae): implications of congruence and incongruence with the ITS phylogeny Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2002; 89(8): 1324 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Buss, T. G. Lammers, and R. R. Wise Seed coat morphology and its systematic implications in Cyanea and other genera of Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2001; 88(7): 1301 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Bell and R. W. Patterson Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae) Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2000; 87(12): 1857 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. A. Prather, C. J. Ferguson, and R. K. Jansen Polemoniaceae phylogeny and classification: implications of sequence data from the chloroplast gene ndhF Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2000; 87(9): 1300 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text]