Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koopowitz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Marchant, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koopowitz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Marchant, T. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koopowitz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Marchant, T. A.

American Journal of Botany, Vol 85, 508, Copyright © 1998 by Botanical Society of America, Inc.

REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY

Postpollination nectar reabsorption in the African epiphyte Aerangis verdickii (Orchidaceae)

H Koopowitz and TA Marchant

Nectar reabsorption in flowering plants seems to be a rare phenomenon and to our knowledge it has not been reported previously in the Orchidaceae. In this study we present data that show statistically significant differences in nectar sugar concentrations before and after pollination. Virgin flowers of the African epiphytic orchid Aerangis verdickii showed mean sugar concentrations in the nectar of 14.4 and of 18.3% in 1994 and 1995, respectively (sucrose mass by mass equivalent). Sugar concentration in nectar from naturally pollinated flowers had a mean of 3.2 and of 8.7% for the same period. In an experiment in the wild 60 flowers were protected against nectar theft by the ants. Half of those flowers were hand-pollinated. Control (virgin) flowers had nectar with a mean value of 13.8%, while flowers measured 48 h after pollination had a mean sugar concentration of 4.3%. The mean volume of nectar based on measurements of 23 virgin flowers from nine different plants was 19 uL. We estimated an average energy value for the nectar produced of 684 J per plant per season. At the study site, over 60% of the unmanipulated flowers were robbed of all their nectar by arboreal ants, Polyrachis spp. (Formicinae). The adaptive significance of nectar reabsorption for A. verdickii is probably a function of the environmental stresses to which it has been exposed and the relative costs of nectar production.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. A. S. Paiva and S. R. Machado
The Floral Nectary of Hymenaea stigonocarpa (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae): Structural Aspects During Floral Development
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 125 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. J. Martins and S. D. Johnson
Hawkmoth pollination of aerangoid orchids in Kenya, with special reference to nectar sugar concentration gradients in the floral spurs
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2007; 94(4): 650 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. STPICZYNSKA
Floral Longevity and Nectar Secretion of Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. (Orchidaceae)
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2003; 92(2): 191 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.