Am. J. Bot. Botany 2008 Ad
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, R. K.
(American Journal of Botany. 1998;85:1766-1778.)
© 1998 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogeny of the Berberidaceae1

Young-Dong Kim2,a and Robert K. Jansena

a Department of Botany and Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78713

Comparative restriction site mapping of the chloroplast genome was performed to examine phylogenetic relationships among 27 species representing 16 genera of the Berberidaceae and two outgroups. Chloroplast genomes of the species included in this study showed no major structural rearrangements (i.e., they are collinear to tobacco cpDNA) except for the extension of the inverted repeat in species of Berberis and Mahonia. Excluding several regions that exhibited severe length variation, a total of 501 phylogenetically informative sites was mapped for ten restriction enzymes. The strict consensus tree of 14 equally parsimonious trees indicated that some berberidaceous genera (Berberis, Mahonia, Diphylleia) are not monophyletic. To explore phylogenetic utility of different parsimony methods phylogenetic trees were generated using Wagner, Dollo, and weighted parsimony for a reduced data set that included 18 species. One of the most significant results was the recognition of the four chromosomal groups, which were strongly supported regardless of the parsimony method used. The most notable difference among the trees produced by the three parsimony methods was the relationships among the four chromosomal groups. The cpDNA trees also strongly supported a close relationship of several generic pairs (e.g., Berberis-Mahonia, Epimedium-Vancouveria, etc.). Maximum likelihood values were computed for the four different tree topologies of the chromosomal groups, two Wagner, one Dollo, and one weighted topology. The results indicate that the weighted tree has the highest likelihood value. The lowest likelihood value was obtained for the Dollo tree, which had the highest bootstrap and decay values. Separate analyses using only the Inverted Repeat (IR) region resulted in a tree that is identical to the weighted tree. Poor resolution and/or support for the relationships among the four chromosomal lineages of the Berberidaceae indicate that they may have radiated from an ancestral stock in a relatively short evolutionary time.

Key Words: Berberidaceae • chloroplast DNA phylogeny • parsimony • restriction sites




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. H. Williams and W. E. Friedman
The four-celled female gametophyte of Illicium (Illiciaceae; Austrobaileyales): implications for understanding the origin and early evolution of monocots, eumagnoliids,and eudicots
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 332 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. A. Wattier, A. L. Davidson, B. A. Ward, and C. A. Maggs
cpDNA-RFLP in Ceramium (Rhodophyta): intraspecific polymorphism and species-level phylogeny
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2001; 88(7): 1209 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.