HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (64) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, G. W. T. Articles by Hartnett, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wilson, G. W. T. Articles by Hartnett, D. C. Agricola Articles by Wilson, G. W. T. Articles by Hartnett, D. C.

Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie¹

^a Division of Biology, 232 Ackert Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5502

Symbiotic associations between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are ubiquitous and ecologically important in many grasslands. Differences in species responses to mycorrhizal colonization can have a significant influence on plant community structure. The growth responses of 36 species of warm- and cool-season tallgrass prairie grasses and 59 tallgrass prairie forbs to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal colonization were assessed in greenhouse studies to examine the extent of interspecific variation in host-plant benefit from the symbiosis and patterns of mycorrhizal dependence among host plant life history (e.g., annual, perennial) and taxonomic (e.g., grass, forb, legume, nonlegume) groups and phenological guilds. There was a strong and significant relationship between phenology of prairie grasses and mycorrhizal responsiveness, however this relationship was less apparent in forbs. Perennial warm-season C₄ grasses and forbs generally benefited significantly from the mycorrhizal symbiosis, whereas biomass production of the cool-season C₃ grasses was not affected. The root systems of the cool-season grasses were also less highly colonized by the AM fungi, as compared to the warm-season grasses or forbs. Unlike the native perennials, annuals were generally not responsive to mycorrhizal colonization and were lower in percentage root colonization than the perennial species. Plant growth responsiveness and AM root colonization were positively correlated for the nonleguminous species, with this relationship being strongest for the cool-season grasses. In contrast, root colonization of prairie legumes showed a significant, but negative, relationship to mycorrhizal growth responsiveness.

Key Words: cool-season grass • forb • mycorrhizae • mycorrhizal responsiveness • phenology • tallgrass prairie • warm-season grass

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-M. Kytoviita and A. L. Ruotsalainen Mycorrhizal benefit in two low arctic herbs increases with increasing temperature Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1309 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Jumpponen and L. C. Johnson Can rDNA analyses of diverse fungal communities in soil and roots detect effects of environmental manipulations--a case study from tallgrass prairie. Mycologia, November 1, 2005; 97(6): 1177 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Staehelin, C. Charon, T. Boller, M. Crespi, and A. Kondorosi Medicago truncatula plants overexpressing the early nodulin gene enod40 exhibit accelerated mycorrhizal colonization and enhanced formation of arbuscules PNAS, December 18, 2001; 98(26): 15366 - 15371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Schultz, R. Michael Miller, J. D. Jastrow, C. V. Rivetta, and J. D. Bever Evidence of a mycorrhizal mechanism for the adaptation of Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) to high- and low-nutrient prairies Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2001; 88(9): 1650 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. W. T. Wilson, D. C. Hartnett, M. D. Smith, and K. Kobbeman Effects of mycorrhizae on growth and demography of tallgrass prairie forbs Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2001; 88(8): 1452 - 1457. [Full Text]