| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Aberdeen, Cruickshank Building, St. Machar Drive,Aberdeen AB24 3UU, Scotland, UK
A review of comparative levels of reproductive success among nectariferous and nectarless orchids worldwide was compiled from a comprehensive survey of fruit set from 117 orchid species in the literature and from our own field studies. It confirms the hypothesis that nectariferous orchids are more successful in setting fruit than are nectarless species. Overall fruit set figures for nectarless and nectariferous orchids were 19.5 and 49.3% for North America, 27.7 and 63.1% for Europe, 41.4 and 74.4% for the temperate southern hemisphere, and 11.5 and 24.9% for the tropics, demonstrating that the dichotomy is consistent across all geographical areas. On average, the provision of nectar doubles the probability of fruit set in both temperate and tropical areas, but tropical orchids are remarkable in that all (whether nectarless or nectariferous, or terrestrial or epiphytic) display low fruit productivity (<50%). Fruiting failure in the tropics may be balanced by higher productivity per capsule, since tropical orchid fruits contain on average 150 times more seeds than temperate ones. Hybridization occurs more frequently among nectarless orchids in Britain and Europe than among nectariferous ones, and there is a significant positive association between orchid rarity and lack of nectar reward in the British Isles. Sexual reproduction in the Orchidaceae is predominantly pollinator dependent, but this can sometimes be successfully circumvented by asexual seed production (agamospermy) or, more frequently, by automatic self-pollination (autogamy). The proportion of highly successful nectarless orchids from all geographic areas is very low and comparable with that of orchids offering rewards other than nectar (~14% of species in each case) emphasizing that high reproductive success is only associated with nectar reward (53% of species). It is suggested that the evolution of nectar production within the family has been the most frequent means of escaping the reproductive limitations of low pollinator visitation frequencies.
Key Words: deceit pollination • hybridization • nectar • Orchidaceae • rarity • reproductive success • temperate orchids • tropical orchids
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Waterman and M. I. Bidartondo Deception above, deception below: linking pollination and mycorrhizal biology of orchids J. Exp. Bot., March 2, 2008; (2008) erm366v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Abdala-Roberts, V. Parra-Tabla, and J. Navarro Is Floral Longevity Influenced by Reproductive Costs and Pollination Success in Cohniella ascendens (Orchidaceae)? Ann. Bot., November 1, 2007; 100(6): 1367 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. ALCANTARA, J. SEMIR, and V. N. SOLFERINI Low Genetic Structure in an Epiphytic Orchidaceae (Oncidium hookeri) in the Atlantic Rainforest of South-eastern Brazil Ann. Bot., December 1, 2006; 98(6): 1207 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. YAMAZAKI and K. MIYOSHI In vitro Asymbiotic Germination of Immature Seed and Formation of Protocorm by Cephalanthera falcata (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., December 1, 2006; 98(6): 1197 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. BATEMAN and P. J. RUDALL Evolutionary and Morphometric Implications of Morphological Variation Among Flowers Within an Inflorescence: A Case-Study Using European Orchids Ann. Bot., November 1, 2006; 98(5): 975 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. DAVIES, M. STPICZYNSKA, and A. GREGG Nectar-secreting Floral Stomata in Maxillaria anceps Ames & C. Schweinf. (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., August 1, 2005; 96(2): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. DAVIES and M. P. TURNER Pseudopollen in Eria Lindl. Section Mycaranthes Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., November 1, 2004; 94(5): 707 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. B. SINGER, A. FLACH, S. KOEHLER, A. J. MARSAIOLI, and M. D. C. E. AMARAL Sexual Mimicry in Mormolyca ringens (Lindl.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae: Maxillariinae) Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 755 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. LEHNEBACH and A. W ROBERTSON Pollination Ecology of Four Epiphytic Orchids of New Zealand Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 773 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. DAVIES and M. P. TURNER Morphology of Floral Papillae in Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav. (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., January 1, 2004; 93(1): 75 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. STPICZYNSKA, K. L. DAVIES, and A. GREGG Nectary Structure and Nectar Secretion in Maxillaria coccinea (Jacq.) L.O. Williams ex Hodge (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., January 1, 2004; 93(1): 87 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. B. SINGER and S. KOEHLER Pollinarium Morphology and Floral Rewards inBrazilian Maxillariinae (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., January 1, 2004; 93(1): 39 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Negre, C. M. Kish, J. Boatright, B. Underwood, K. Shibuya, C. Wagner, D. G. Clark, and N. Dudareva Regulation of Methylbenzoate Emission after Pollination in Snapdragon and Petunia Flowers PLANT CELL, December 1, 2003; 15(12): 2992 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. STPICZYNSKA Floral Longevity and Nectar Secretion of Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., August 1, 2003; 92(2): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Smithson The consequences of rewardlessness in orchids: reward-supplementation experiments with Anacamptis morio (Orchidaceae) Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1579 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Pacini and M. Hesse Types of Pollen Dispersal Units in Orchids, and their Consequences for Germination and Fertilization Ann. Bot., June 1, 2002; 89(6): 653 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
