Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obeso, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Retuerto, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Obeso, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Retuerto, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Obeso, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Retuerto, R.
(American Journal of Botany. 1998;85:1602-1608.)
© 1998 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Sex ratios, size distributions, and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium (Aquifoliaceae)1

José Ramón Obeso4,a, Manuel Alvarez-Santullanoa and Rubén Retuertob

a Dpto Biología Organismos y Sistemas,Unidad de Ecología, Universidad de Oviedo, E33071 Oviedo, Spain; and b Area de Ecología, Facultad de Biologia, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, E15071 Santiago, Spain

Sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in physiology and growth were studied in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium at two localities in northern Spain. Genet sex ratio was significantly male biased in one locality but not in the other. However, ramet and flowering ramet sex ratios were male biased at both study sites. Males had significantly thicker main trunks than females in one locality and produced more ramets in the other. Growth rate, estimated from mean width of annual rings, did not differ between localities, but males produced wider rings than females at both sites. Mean annual growth rates over the last 10, 20, and 30 yr were significantly higher for males. Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence indicated that the efficiency of photosynthesis of leaves on nonfruiting branches of females was higher than for leaves on branches of male plants under low-light conditions, though not under saturating-light conditions. Efficiency of photosynthesis was significantly lower on fruiting branches of female plants than on nonfruiting branches. We discuss whether the observed between-sex differences are attributable to the higher cost of reproduction in females and/or to pollen competition.

Key Words: Aquifoliaceae • chlorophyll fluorescence • dioecy • Ilex • physiological differentiation • sex ratio • sexual dimorphism • tree growth




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Matsuyama and M. Sakimoto
Allocation to Reproduction and Relative Reproductive Costs in Two Species of Dioecious Anacardiaceae with Contrasting Phenology
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2008; 101(9): 1391 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. T. Wheelwright and B. A. Logan
Previous-year reproduction reduces photosynthetic capacity and slows lifetime growth in females of a neotropical tree
PNAS, May 25, 2004; 101(21): 8051 - 8055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. B. Nicotra, R. L. Chazdon, and R. A. Montgomery
Sexes show contrasting patterns of leaf and crown carbon gain in a dioecious rainforest shrub
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 347 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A.-F. Rocheleau and G. Houle
Different cost of reproduction for the males and females of the rare dioecious shrub Corema conradii (Empetraceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2001; 88(4): 659 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.