American Journal of Botany, Vol 84, 735, Copyright © 1997 by Botanical Society of America, Inc.

STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT

The role of the epidermis as a stiffening agent in Tulipa (Liliaceae) stems

KJ Niklas and DJ Paolillo

We investigated the hypothesis that the epidermis is a tension-stressed "skin'' whose contribution to stem stiffness depends on the turgor pressure exerted on it by an hydrostatically inflated inner "core'' of tissues. This hypothesis was tested by relying on the intensities of bending stresses due to stem flexure, which must reach their maximum levels at the outer surface of epidermis such that damage to the surface of the stem should produce the most significant decrease in overall flexural stiffness. We discerned whether the principal tension supporting members at the stem surface (cellulosic microfibrils) were oriented parallel or normal to stem length by comparing the bending stiffness of stems before and after their surface cells first received three parallel longitudinal incisions followed by one helical incision, and by comparing the bending stiffness of stems for which the sequence of cuts was reversed. The same protocol was also applied to stems with various water potentials to determine the effect of hydrostatic pressure on stem stiffness contributed by the surface. Based on the behavior of 82 turgid Tulipa stems, parallel cuts reduced, on average, stem stiffness by 8%, whereas a subsequent helical incision further reduced stiffness by 42%. In contrast, an initial helical incision reduced stem stiffness by 50%, while three subsequent parallel cuts through the same stems did not significantly further reduce stiffness. These results suggested that the net orientation of cellulose microfibrils in the outer epidermal walls was parallel to stem length. This was confirmed by microscopic observations of cells with dichroic staining and polarized light. The responses to surgical damage were directly proportional to stem water potential. We thus conclude that the epidermis, probably in conjunction with a single layer of subepidermal collenchyma cells, acts as a tension-stiffening agent that can contribute as much as 50% to overall stem stiffness We present a simple mechanical model that can account for all our observations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Kutschera The Growing Outer Epidermal Wall: Design and Physiological Role of a Composite Structure Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 615 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Onoda, F. Schieving, and N. P.R. Anten Effects of Light and Nutrient Availability on Leaf Mechanical Properties of Plantago major: A Conceptual Approach Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 727 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Burgert Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1391 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Schopfer Biomechanics of plant growth Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1415 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Hejnowicz and W. Barthlott Structural and mechanical peculiarities of the petioles of giant leaves of Amorphophallus (Araceae) Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2005; 92(3): 391 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. GOODMAN Mechanical Adaptations of Cleavers (Galium aparine) Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 475 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Matas, E. D. Cobb, J. A. Bartsch, D. J. Paolillo Jr., and K. J. Niklas Biomechanics and anatomy of Lycopersicon esculentum fruit peels and enzyme-treated samples Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 352 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kerstens, W. F. Decraemer, and J.-P. Verbelen Cell Walls at the Plant Surface Behave Mechanically Like Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials Plant Physiology, October 1, 2001; 127(2): 381 - 385. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Niklas The mechanical role of bark Am. J. Botany, April 1, 1999; 86(4): 465 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Spatz, L Kohler, and K. Niklas Mechanical behaviour of plant tissues: composite materials or structures? J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3269 - 3272. [Abstract] [PDF]